Chinese Exclusion Act – Research Paper Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

Suggestions show that the enactment of this Act also affected other people including the Asians. In fact, documented evidence maintains that if any Chinese individual left the United States for another country, he or she had to obtain a reentry permit when coming back (Hune & Nomura, 2003). This kind of certification went ahead to afflict the chances Chinese people had when it came to becoming full citizens of the United States. As such, the Chinese and Asians would remain complete aliens whenever residing in the US territorial boundaries (Soennichsen, 2011).

Following this preamble, it is seeable that when this Act came into passage, all the Chinese men living in the United States lost any chances of ever reuniting with their families and wives back at home on one end. On the other end, they also unable to establish a family of their own since they were no more but just mere aliens who had few privileges and tones of restrictions (Gold, 2012). Amendments Although several capitalists opposed the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act on matters related to economic factors, many Chinese people staying in the US faced a huge dilemma; they wondered whether to choose to go back to China and reunite with their families or stay in US forever (Gyory, 2008).

In spite of the widespread enmity and dislike for the Chinese, some of the US ruling clergymen did not seem to draw satisfaction from the already set restrictions. They went ahead to amend the Chinese Exclusion Act by including the Scott Act (1888) which deterred those Chinese who left the US from ever coming back (Hune & Nomura, 2003).

The Scott Act clarifications stipulated that the set laws applied to any Chinese despite their ethnicity or country of origin. As such, whatever act of law was applicable to every single Chinese individual who happened to be living in the US. As a matter of essence, the stipulations of the Act frustrated many people of the Chinese decency as in most cases it only resolevd to oppress them and fostered segregation towards Asians. In 1892, the Geary Act resolved to renew the Chinese Exclusion Act for ten more years where its provisions strengthened in some parts while in others, it provided no terminal date.

During this time, the affected parties continued to suffer in misery but things worsened after the ten years (Gold, 2012). In 1902, any Chinese person living in the United States had to acquire a certification for residence if he or she so wished to reside in the United States (Gyory, 2008).

References

Gold, M. (2012). Forbidden citizens: Chinese exclusion and the U.S. Congress : a legislative history. Alexandria, VA: TheCapital.Net.

Gyory, A. (2008). Closing the gate: Race, politics, and the Chinese Exclusion Act. Chapel Hill [u.a.: Univ. of North Carolina Press.

Hune, S. & Nomura, G. (2003). Asian - Pacific Islander American women: A historical anthology. New York: New York University Press.

Soennichsen, J. (2011). The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. Santa Barbara, Calif: Greenwood.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us