The researchers assert that organisations should not rely on traditional PRP systems rather they should focus on contextual possibilities for designing the PRP systems in order to enhance employee motivation and performance. Schmidt et al. , (2011) also suggested, though it the context of public services, that for PRP to have a positive effect on employee performance it should focus on employee participation in designing the pay system. According to the researchers, this collective designing of system will help renegotiate the performance criteria which will then have an impact of employee performance and motivation.
Furthermore, Forest (2008) also suggested that PRP can be used to keep employees intrinsically motivated by linking pay for performance with fair appraisal systems; hence it can be said that it is time to merge intrinsic and extrinsic rewards systems with the help of collective negotiations and participative interactions in order to keep employees motivated. Revolving around the research question outlined earlier, following are the research aims and objectives; To critically evaluate the elements that can help PRP enhance employee motivation. To investigate how different elements within organisation can link together to design a robust contingent compensation system. Based on these objectives following conceptual framework is designed for this study; Figure I – Conceptual Framework for this Study This framework suggests that if different elements in a compensation system are well-blended and if intrinsic and extrinsic elements are combined well outcomes would be enhanced performance and motivation.
This study will aim to explore these aspects on how PRP can be used as a motivational tool if the whole compensations system is looked at as a whole. Exercise 2 - The Timetable Tasks First half of April Second half of April First half of May Second half of May First half of June Second half of June Third Week on June Topic selection and justification through literature search.
Agreeing on aims and methodology. Refining aims and objectives and studying further literature to form topic base. Approaching participants and taking informed consent. Data Collection Data Documentation and Analysis Report Writing (though few parts have already been written previously) Proofreading and submission of dissertation. Exercise 3 - Locating Literature Boachie-Mensah and Dogbe (2011) carried out an exploratory study to find out the effectiveness of PRP as a motivational tool to enhance organisational performance.
Argyrous, G. (2010). Evidence for Policy and Decision-Making: A Practical Guide. Australia: UNSW Press.
Betz, N. E., & Fassinger, R. E. (2011). Methodologies in Counselling Psychology. In: Altmaier, E. M., & Hansen, J. C. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Counselling Psychology, pp. 237-269. New York: Oxford University Press.
Black, K. (2009). Business Statistics: Contemporary Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Boachie-Mensah, F., & Dogbe, O. D. (2011). Performance-Based Pay as a Motivational Tool for Achieving Organisational Performance: An Exploratory Case Study. International Journal of Business and Management 6 (12): 270-285.
Coule, T. (2013). Theories of knowledge and focus groups in organization and management research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management 8 (2): 148 – 162
Forest, V. (2008). Performance-related pay and work motivation: theoretical and empirical perspectives for the French civil service. International Review of Administrative Sciences 74 (2): 325-339.
Hague, P., Hague, N., & Morgan, C. (2004). Marketing research in practice a guide to the basics. London: Kogan Page Limited.
Hollowa, I. (2005). Qualitative Research in Health Care. England: McGraw-Hill International.
International Chamber of Commerce (2008). ICC/ESOMAR International Code on Market and Social Research. [Online]. Available: <http://www.esomar.org/uploads/public/knowledge-and-standards/codes-and-guidelines/ICCESOMAR_Code_English_.pdf> [Accessed on: April 20, 2014].
Jackson, L. (2010). Research Methods: A Modular Approach. 2nd edn. USA: Cengage Learning.
King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
Lehmann, D. R., Gupta S., & Steckel, J. S. (1998). Marketing Research. USA: Addison-Wesley Education Publishers Inc.
Liamputtong, P. (2011). Focus Group Methodology: Principle and Practice. London: SAGE.
Malhotra, N., & Birks, D. (2006). Marketing Research An applied Approach. 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Marsden, D., French, S., & Kobi, K. (2000). Why Does Performance Pay Demotivate? Financial Incentives versus Performance Appraisal. London: Centre for Economic Performance, Discussion paper 476.
Perry, J. L., Engbers, T. A., & Jun, S. Y. (2009). Back to the Future? Performance-Related Pay, Empirical Research, and the perils of Resistance. Public Administration Review 69 (1): 33-51.
Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schmidt, W., Trittel, N., & Müller, A. (2011). Performance-related pay in German public services: The example of local authorities in North Rhine-Westphalia. Employee Relations 33 (2): 140 – 158.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.