Policy Issue Assessment: Consumer Privacy – Term Paper Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

POLICY ISSUE ASSESSMENT: CONSUMMER PRIVACY Introduction There are myriad of issues influencing and challenging the privacy of consumers with vigorous business management and marketing strategies in commercial and industrial organizations. As information technology took authority in propagating consumerism, companies have also devised strategies to track personal profiles and to record products purchased by consumers through e-card systems or through social network system. People have increasingly been adaptive to e-commerce, pay through cash cards, and got electronically registered as members of major commercial institutions (Henry, 2010). This is the ease of modernity as e-commerce introduced consumers to transactions by simply swiping their ATMs in tendering payments.

But along these developments brought questions on whether or not consumers right to privacy are protected (Henry, 2010). This study is a critical qualitative explication about consumers right taking into account policies and practices surrounding these modern commercial behaviors of consumers. Consumer and privacy defined Consumers are buyers or purchasers of any service or goods from commercial sites and are economically explained as an important factor in markets value chain. Their behaviors in the market are influenced by myriad of factors, such as their economic standing, political views, level of environmental advocacy, theosophical beliefs, as well as their physiological status (Perner, 2011; Casquet & Diaz-Mendez, 2010).

Their strategic motivation and decision-making, in relation to their needs and wants are also motivating factors in determining their preference over products. As part of micro-economic systems, public policies also direct and supposedly protect the interest of consumers (Perner, 2011). Policies are also recently improved as social marketing is rigorously influencing consumers at the household level (Perner, 2011; Croitoru & Ristea, & Stegaroiu; 2010).

Privacy, on the other hand, refers to specific directives which prohibit disclosure of data and information as part of any business transactions which could be transpiring in commercial areas and amongst banking institutions (Burke, 2001). Privacy is either informational, physical, decisional, or propriety. Informational privacy refers to that information obtained for medical or employment purposes either manually or electronically generated that are supposedly be kept with confidentiality and of protection (Burke, 2001).


Casquet, Clementina Galera & Diaz-Mendez, Montserrat. "Is Responsible Consumption Compatible with Economic Crisis?," Apas Papers 143, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS. 2010.

Croitoru, Gabriel & Ristea, Ana Lucia & Stegaroiu, Ion, "Marketing through the Eye of the Law," Apas Papers 132, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS. 2010.

Helberger, Natali & Kerényi, Kristóf & Krings, Bettina & Lambers, Rik & Orwat, Carsten & Riehm, Ulrich & van Gompel, Stef & Dufft, Nicole, "Digital Rights Management and Consumer Acceptability: A Multi-Disciplinary Discussion of Consumer Concerns and Expectations," MPRA Paper 6641, University Library of Munich, Germany, Nov 2004.

Jens Schovsbo."Integrating Consumer Rights into Copyright Law: From a European Perspective," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, 2008: vol. 31(4), pages 393-408.

Nicoleta-Dorina Racola-Paina & Theodora Alexandra Luca, "Nowadays Online Consumers Rights And Interests. Case Study- The Romanian Educated Online Young Consumer," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, 2011: vol. 6(2), Summer.

Paul W. Bauer, "Consumer financial privacy and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act," Economic Commentary, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, May 2002.

Paul C. Henry, "How Mainstream Consumers Think about Consumer Rights and Responsibilities," Journal of Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, 2010: vol. 37(4), pages 670-687.

Sakina Shaik Ahmad Yusoff-PhD & Shamsuddin Suhor & Rahmah Ismail & Azimon Abdul Aziz & Muhammad Rizal Razman & Kartini Aboo Talib@Khalid. "Consumer Right To Redress Against Traders Under The Law Of Supply Of Goods: A Comparative Study Of Selected Jurisdictions," Journal of Global Management, Global Research Agency, 2011: vol. 2(2), pages 146-162.

Vasile Dinu, "Ways Of Implicating More Actively For The Consumers Associations In Promoting And Defending Consumers Rights," The AMFITEATRU Economic Journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, 2006: vol. 8(19), pages 40-45.

Voicu-Dan Dragomir & Elena Roxana Anghel (Ilcu). "Social Responsibility Practices Regarding Facilities Granted to Employees and Consumer Protection in Selected European Companies," The AMFITEATRU Economic Journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, 2011: vol. 13(29), pages 86-103.

Sarah A. Burke, 2001. "Privacy matters: Payments Cards Center Workshop on the right to privacy and the financial services industry," Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, 2001: Q4, pages 5-8.

Mark Gazaleh. Online trust and perceived utility for consumers of web privacy statements: UK Overview – WBS. 2008.

Aya, Sahin & Ozlem Kor, 2009. "A Research Which Analyzes The Factors Effecting Consumer Consciousness About Consumer Rights From The Point Of Consumers Who Live In Mersin," Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, Anadolu University, vol. 9(2), pages 105-126, December.

Sarah A. Burke, 2001. "Privacy matters: Payments Cards Center Workshop on the right to privacy and the financial services industry," Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, issue Q4, pages 5-8

Allred, C.R., Smith, S.M., Swinyard, W.R. (2006), “E-shopping Loves and Fearful

Conservatives: a Market Segmentation Analysis”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.

34, No. 4/5, pp. 308-333

Andrews, L., Boyle, M.V. (2008), “Consumers’ Accounts of Perceived Risk Online and the

Influence of Communication Sources”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 11, No. 1,

pp. 59-75

Cho, J. (2004), “Likelihood to abort an Online Transaction: Influences from Cognitive

Evaluations, Attitudes, and Behavioral Variables”, Information Management, Vol. 41, No.

7, pp. 827–838

Constantinides, E. (2004), “Influencing the Online Consumer’s Behaviour: the Web

Experience”, Internet Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 111-126

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us